Help sustain
SpideredNews
NEWS SUMMARY PAGE
Add SN feed to your site

Add SN feed to your site
 NEWS SUMMARY
Breaking News

 IMPORTANT : Please use top right "PayPal Donate" link to help sustain SpideredNews.com. For waged subscribers, we suggest £3 per month which is excellent value for money at 10p per day.

"In an era where media consolidation is occurring at an all-too rapid pace it's essential to look for alternative news sources that are free from corporate bias. The future of our rather stupid species depends on it. Sites like yours have made a massive impact on me over the last year, I'm very grateful." http://www.lukeskirenko.com

Hint: If you spot (or create) an article or video which should be highlighted, please post it on the WPN Forums. SpideredNews.com could then spotlight it.
Highlighted US Administration NewsAdd to NEWS SUMMARY page
WPN  
DEMOCRATICUNDERGROUND Fri, 09 May 2008
" ...Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008...

Look the problem is not so much her acknowledgment of her support among whites of lower socioeconomic status, which is true to some degree if not somewhat tacky to bring up the way she did. It's her characterization of "WORKING, HARD WORKING AMERICANS,WHITE AMERICANS." The inference is obvious: that only white Americans are hard working (as only hard working Americans are working). In other words this is straight up Trent Lott at a Strom Thurmond party shit. I'm sure she's going to come out and say she misspoke. Whatever. She was clearly trying to walk on the fence of acceptable racial pandering and wound up taking a BIG misstep over. The Clinton's just seem completely hellbent at this point of screwing up their legacy and nothing more. Shouldn't someone talk them, down from the edge of the bridge?
PRESSTV Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:32:54 GMT
The Pentagon has temporarily stopped feeding information to pundits who generate 'favorable' war coverage for the Bush administration.

According to The New York Times, the Defense Department had been giving information to retired military officers serving as pundits for various media organizations in a bid to garner favorable media coverage of the White House wartime performance.

"Analysts have been wooed in hundreds of private briefings with senior military leaders, including officials with significant influence over contracting and budget matters, records show," the Times article read.

In return, they echoed President Bush's talking points, 'sometimes even when they suspected the information was false or inflated'.

"Following the allegations, the story that is printed in the New York Times, I directed my staff to halt, to suspend the activities that may be ongoing with retired military analysts to give me time to review the situation," said Principal deputy assistant secretary of Defense for public affairs Robert Hastings in an interview with Stripes.

While mainstream US media has chosen to ignore the newfound information, the revelation has caused widespread anger among some high ranking US officials

"There is nothing inherently wrong with providing information to the public and the press," Democratic US congressional representative Ike Skelton said.

"But there is a problem if the Pentagon is providing special access to retired officers and then basically using them as pawns to spout the administration's talking points of the day," continued the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.